logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.10.20 2017고단1192
사문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a year and a fine of KRW 4,00,000.

However, the defendant shall be the defendant for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2017 Highest 1192"

1. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act is a holder of BKaman car.

No owner of any motor vehicle shall operate any motor vehicle on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance.

Nevertheless, around 10:05 on June 1, 2016, the Defendant operated the said car that was not covered by mandatory insurance from approximately 1 km section from around 37-4 to the roads adjacent to the 337-4, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, 2016.

2. Around 10:05 on June 1, 2016, the Defendant: (a) operated a BF car on the front road of the Young-gu, Young-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, which was not mandatory insurance as indicated in paragraph (1); (b) controlled the police officer E belonging to the police officer of the Suwon-gu, Police Station D District; and (c) demanded the Defendant to prepare and submit a vehicle operation report under his/her own name; (d) the Defendant was able to prepare the said written report in his/her own name and make it available to the said E in his/her sexual name in the name of “F”, “G (part of resident registration numbers for the protection of personal information)”, “F” in the resident registration number column, and “F” in the statement, and submitted it to the said E after signing by the F.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant forged a copy of the vehicle operation report in F, a private document related to fact-finding without authority, and exercised the aforementioned forged vehicle operation statement.

3. When the Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act, on the date and time, at the place, as described in paragraph 2, received a request from police officers E to inform of resident registration numbers to verify personal information, the Defendant entered “G (part of resident registration numbers omitted for the protection of personal information)”, which was one’s own Dong F’s resident registration number, which was known to ordinary people, as one’s resident registration number.

In this respect.

arrow