logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.05.24 2016고단7322
사문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 1, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to one year to imprisonment for a violation of road traffic law (drinking driving) and a violation of road traffic law (drawing driving) at the Daegu District Court on May 1, 201, and completed the execution of the sentence on June 20, 2014.

1. On June 26, 2016, the Defendant, who violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving) driven a F Kawn vehicle without obtaining a driver’s license from around 10:00 on a road in the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, along with approximately 100 meters wide from the front side of the “Daubee” road to the front road of the Incheon post office.

2. The accused of a violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Insurance shall be the owner of FF carp vehicles, and no motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance shall be operated on the road;

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated an automobile which was not covered by mandatory insurance at the time and place mentioned in paragraph (1).

3. The Defendant was asked to submit a driver’s license to a police officer who belongs to the Incheon Western Police Station Q District as an illegal internship while driving F Kaman at the time and place specified in paragraph (1).

Therefore, the defendant was in possession of without a license because it is difficult to find out the fact of driving without a license.

The first driver's license certificate was presented to R as one's own, and thus, the public document was denied.

4. At the time and place specified in paragraph 3, the Defendant: (a) requested R to prepare a “written statement of vehicle operation” from the R; (b) stated “I”; (c) in the name column; and (d) written “J” and written statement in the resident registration number column as “I”; and (c) sent the Defendant’s unmanned to R.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a written statement, which is a private document related to rights and obligations, and issued it to R who is unaware of the fact.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant in the second trial records;

arrow