1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.

(1) The defendant shall set forth in attached Form 10.

(b) 12,377,00,000 12,377,000,000 - 4 packing 58,549,500,000 - No dispute over 5 electrical engineering 22,205,000 - 22,205,000 -6 street 12,910,000 - 12,949,000 - 7 traffic signal, etc. - 7 traffic signal, etc. - 1949,000 ,000 , 12,949,000 ,000 ,00 ,000 ,00 ,000 ,009,000 ,000 ,079,079,000 - 10,007 - 79,000 - 97 ,07 ,0040

(1) 4,76,00,000 1,199,832,305 】 (B) 9,519,60,609,609,4821 】 86,496,000 sewage treatment plants 86,400,000,000 86,496,000 ; 24,817,000,000,817,000,000 15,000 / (15,000 / 31,337,000,000,000 / (15,000,000 / (15,000,000,007, 889, 1604, 2016, 207, 209, 205, 207, 2094, 206, 2007

However, in addition to the whole purport of the pleadings in the statement in Eul evidence 12-1 to 3, the construction cost of ecological corridor 24,164,40,000 won was paid as an ecological corridor construction cost, the fact that the net construction cost of the whole structure (bridge, etc.) was 221,209,000,000 won, and the total structure (bridge, etc.) construction cost was calculated by adding value-added tax to the above net construction cost, and the fact that the construction cost was calculated in consideration of the increased portion of 1.1013 according to the inflation rate is acknowledged. Among structures, the ecological corridor cannot be deemed as a basic living facility, and such construction cost should not be included in the construction cost