logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2012.10.12 2010가합19417
부당이득금 반환
Text

1. Each of the plaintiffs' claims is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

(8) Recognition of an amount multiplied by 3,628,387,150 square meters = 18,50,000 won x 1,818,619,307 x 148 square meters: All of 16,102,00,00 won for electric transit : 56,30,000 won: All of 56,30,000 won are recognized. (9) Underground tea: 426,11,00,000 won are recognized. (10) Tunnels: 41,20,00,00,000 won for residential facilities x 70,000,000 won for residential facilities x 06,00,000 won for residential facilities x 138,951,000,000,000 won for residential facilities x 706,005,000 won for residential facilities for residential purposes;

Therefore, the cost associated with the installation of metropolitan transport facilities cannot be considered as the cost for the installation of arterial facilities.

(20) there is insufficient evidence to regard it as construction costs for arterial facilities, such as the structure hole, river hole, reservoir, light crossing river BOX, waste water pipe, waste incineration pipe:

C. Direct labor cost: According to the statement in Eul evidence 1, the direct labor cost can be recognized as the fact that the remainder of the direct labor cost, such as site cost and cost creation cost, is calculated by multiplying the direct labor cost by 1.93%, so the direct labor cost shall also be the basic facilities.

arrow