1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

The defendant is the plaintiff G(1), J(4), Q(10), AT(38), AY(43), and the successor.

...,377,000,000 다툼없음 4 포장공 58,549,000,000 58,549,000,000 다툼없음 5 전기공 22,205,000,000 22,205,000,000 다툼없음 6 가로등공 12,910,000,000 12,910,000,000 다툼없음 7 교통신호등공 1,949,000,000 1,949,000,000 다툼없음 8 배수지 10,979,000,000 10,979,000,000 다툼없음 9 토공 58,424,000,000 14,708,141,545 ①×(B÷A) 10 구조물공(교량 등) 267,979,000,000 238,705,739,778 산출방식은 뒤에서[⑵의 ㈎항] 보는 바와 같다.

(1) 4,76,00,000 square meters for structures ( retaining walls) 4,76,00,199,832,305 】 (B) 9,519,609,609,6821 】 (B±) 86,496,000 sewage treatment plants 86,496,000,000; 24,817,000,000,000 or 315,37,37,000,000 or larger-15 design service charges, etc. 】 (B) 12 military units ± 14,814,00,000,007, 817,000 or more 31,37,000,000,007,897, 89, 86816, 2014, 207, 20946, 209

㈎ 구조물공(교량 등) 관련 원고는 구조물공(교량 등)과 관련하여 전체 구조물 공사비(교량 등) 267,979,000,000원 중 생태통로공사비로 24,164,400,000원을 공제한 243,814,600,00원을 설치비용으로 주장한다.

However, comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in Eul evidence 21, the fact that the construction cost of an ecological corridor was paid 24,164,400,000 won as an ecological corridor construction cost, the fact that the net construction cost of the whole structure (bridges, etc.) was 221,209,000,000, the total structure (bridges, etc.) construction cost added value-added tax to the above net construction cost, and the fact that the construction cost is calculated in consideration of the increased portion of 1.1013 according to the inflation, and the construction cost of an ecological corridor among the structures should not be included in the construction cost of the basic living facility.