logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 홍성지원 2012.10.24 2012고단712
위증
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 50.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 9, 2012, Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year and six months for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective weapon, injury by a deadly weapon, etc.), Defendant C was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc.), Defendant D was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a suspended sentence of eight years for a crime of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. (mariju) and the judgment was finalized on May 17, 2012.

Defendant

C around November 28, 2011, at the front of the F Party of Hongsung-gun, Hongsung-gun, one tobacco containing the hemp plant to D. On December 201, 201, Defendant A was suspected of delivering one tobacco containing the hemp plant to A in front of the singing line for its operation, which was located in Hongsung-gun, Hongsung-gun, Hongsung-gun; Defendant A was suspected of smoking one at the first instance judgment of 20:1 on December 23, 201, 200, 200 the instant case was charged of smoking one at the Kitco-Gun’s emergency stairs located in Hongsung-gun, Hongsung-gun; Defendant D was charged of smoking one at the 1st instance judgment of 20:1 on November 28, 201; Defendant D was charged of smoking one at the 1st instance judgment of 1.21:20 on July 1, 201, 201 among the Defendant’s Hasung-gun, Hongsung-gun, with the first instance judgment of 1.

Defendant

C, Defendant A, and Defendant D led to the entire facts charged against them in the above trial process, but I denied the fact of their smoking, and I applied for the witness of the Defendants, arguing that “The reaction of training for training the urine test by second-hand smoke was only caused by second-hand smoke, and there was no direct smoking.”

1. Defendant A: (a) around 16:00 on February 20, 2012.

arrow