1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On January 1, 1997, the Plaintiff was appointed as a civilian military employee in the occupational category of the general machinery industry (Grade 9) and served at the 3rd unit of the 3rd unit of the 3rd unit of the 3rd unit of the 3rd unit of the 3rd unit and was subject to ex officio dismissal as follows:

B. The Plaintiff constitutes the lower 10 per cent below 42 points in the rating of service performance in the preceding and second half years of 2017.

(2) the Corporation has received the

(2) In addition, the lower court determined that: (a) performance rating for the first half of 2017 has been continuously assessed at least twice as the first class; (b) performance rating for the second half of 2017; (c) performance rating for the first half of 2017; (d) performance rating for the second half of 2017; (c) performance rating for the second half of 20: (d) performance rating for the second half of 20: (e) performance rating for the second half of 2016; and (e) the first half of 2016, as the organization’s organization of exhibition at the work site for the first half of 201; (e) the first half of 2016; (e) the first half of 2016, the first half of 201 and the second half of 2010, who recommended the transfer of a military unit to the top of the commander; (e) the first half of 2010 - performance rating for the second half of 200 -200 -200 -20 -20 -20 -20 -20 -2.