beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with labor of one year and six months and fine of 50 million won, Defendant B's imprisonment with labor of one year and six months and fine of 35 million won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant A was in office as the head of the general affairs division of the Incheon Metropolitan Office of Education from January 1, 2003 to March 21, 2004; the head of the O from July 1, 2007 to December 31, 2008; and the head of the P Bureau from July 1, 2010 to February 29, 2012.
Defendant
B served as QR in Incheon Metropolitan City from July 16, 2001 to July 17, 2005, as SR from July 18, 2005 to July 15, 2009, and as TR from July 1, 201 to June 30, 2014.
2. Defendants’ co-principal conduct
A. According to the provisions of Article 39 of the Local Public Officials Act, Articles 30 through 32 of the Decree on the Appointment of Local Public Officials, and Articles 5, 8, 9, and 27 of the Rule on the Evaluation of Local Public Officials belonging to R, a person eligible for promotion of a local public official is first a person eligible for evaluation of service performance (hereinafter referred to as “evaluation person”).
)The person whose work performance is evaluated and confirmed (hereinafter referred to as “verification person”);
(3) The appointment authority shall prepare a list of candidates for promotion by setting the priority order in the last few years (in the case of class 5, 3 years or longer, 5 years or longer, and the sum of the supplementary points and career points of the public officials subject to evaluation and the number of candidates for promotion in the order of precedence, as determined by the MP Committee, after objectively evaluating the performance, performance, performance, etc. of duties during each evaluation period, and submitting them to the Work Performance Evaluation Committee (AI), and (2) based on the list of documentary records submitted by each service unit by the MP Committee, and notify the appointment authority (R) of the performance rating based on the list of documentary records submitted by each service unit.
In addition, when there is no immediate superior supervisor of the evaluator, the appointing authority may not designate the person to be confirmed, but the appointing authority shall not become a confirmer and the appointing authority, such as the appraiser, the confirmer, the person to be confirmed, and the personnel committee.