1. The Defendant’s disposition of exclusion from promotion against the Plaintiff on July 1, 2014 shall be revoked.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

In light of the above legal principles, the court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles as to the promotion of candidates for promotion, and thereby exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of qualification, and thereby exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of qualification, and thereby exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of qualification, as otherwise alleged in the ground of appeal.

(b) as shown in the attached Form of the relevant statutes;

C. Facts 1) The Defendant, on October 17, 2013, published the “Work Performance Evaluation Plan for the second half of the year 2013” and on April 17, 2014, “The Work Performance Evaluation Plan for the first half of the year 2014” respectively. The subject of the summary evaluation is as follows: (i) the person who is assessed as a public official in general service or special service at Grade V or below; (ii) the person who is assessed as a public official in general service or special service at Grade V or below; and (iii) the person who is confirmed as to the person who is determined and confirmed by Grade V or VI, and the deputy head of the State or the deputy head of the Gu (Article 8(5) of the Local Public Officials' Rating Regulations 50 points of work performance evaluation * The evaluation of the attitude of performing his/her duties is reflected in the evaluation of “faith” in the performance of duties

Ⅱ. A person who conducts the evaluation of work performance rating shall conduct an evaluation after consulting with the person who confirmed the direction of the evaluation before conducting the evaluation, and the person who conducted the evaluation shall conduct the evaluation independently, and when the person who prepared the evaluation opinion prepares and submits it to the person who conducted the evaluation, he/she shall refer to the period of the evaluation in his/her work performance report, work in charge, work performance, and the result of the deliberation and evaluation in an objective and fair manner. ① Evaluation of work performance according to the following standards for each evaluation element, ② Evaluation of work performance, ② Evaluation of excellent, ② Evaluation, ④ Evaluation of work performance, ④ Evaluation of the person who conducted the evaluation. ② Evaluation of the person who conducted the evaluation shows specific elements in the behavior of the person who conducted the evaluation.