Defendant

C Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and two months, and Defendant D, respectively, shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of two years.

Defendant

A and Defendant B, respectively.

Criminal facts

[2013 Highest 1622] Defendant A served as CN (Grade VII) in charge of personnel affairs at the KL division (former CM division) from August 22, 2007 to July 30, 2009, Defendant A served as the CP (Grade VI) in the KCO and its recent period.

Work performance ratings for public officials of Grade VI or lower belonging to KK shall be annually;

6. As of 30. and 31. December 31, 199, the evaluation of work performance (each office, department, small office, or Eup/Myeon) and the evaluation of work performance (the deputy head of the Gun) separately determine the evaluation point for the public officials subject to the evaluation, and prepare the “evaluation of work performance” and “evaluation of work performance by evaluation unit”. In fact, the deputy head of the Gun, as the above confirmation person, shall first determine the evaluation point by evaluation unit and give the person in charge of personnel affairs the evaluation of work performance (30 points and 15 points in work performance) in the order of 1th (45 points) to the person in charge of personnel affairs. Accordingly, the evaluation of work performance is directly related to the determination of the evaluation point and the evaluation of work performance and the evaluation unit shall be prepared at the same time.

On the other hand, the KAC Q Committee Chairperson shall review and determine the priority and rating points of the "service performance rating table" prepared on the basis of the list of service performance ratings by the above evaluation unit, and the order of priority on the list of service performance ratings by the evaluation unit cannot be changed.

In addition, each year after the completion of the above review and decision.

7.31. &

1. As of 31. 30, public officials meeting the requirements for promotion (e.g., the arrival of the years required for promotion) calculated the work performance rating (70 scores) and the career rating (30 scores) and determined the order of promotion. In this case, work performance rating points shall be calculated by averaging the average of the rating points within the last two years from the base date of the work performance rating for public officials of Grade VI and VII (x40/100 of the average score of the rating points within the last one year) and calculated by adding up the rating points within the last two years from the base date of the work performance rating for public officials of Grade VI and VII (x40/100 of the average score of the rating points within the last one year). Such calculated points and the