(영문) 창원지방법원 2014.10.31 2014고단2270

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 창원지방법원 2014.10.31 2014고단2270

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a driver of B rocketing another car.

On July 1, 2014, the Defendant had a duty of care to prevent traffic accidents by failing to drive a vehicle at a speed or in such a manner as to inflict any danger and obstacle on others according to the traffic situation of the road and the structure and performance of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and was parked on the right side of the front side of the Victim E (hereinafter referred to as “victim E”) with the driver’s seat back part of the FRati vehicle owned by the Defendant, which was parked on the front side of the front line of the Defendant’s vehicle (hereinafter referred to as “the victim’s 25-year-old vehicle”) by the Defendant’s negligence, and the victim G(the victim’s 2-year-old vehicle less than the 51-year-old H vehicle).

) The back part of the victim 1 vehicle is the front part of the damaged one vehicle, and the victim I who was parked while the damaged 2 vehicle was pushed (e.g., the victim 3 vehicle under the 34-year-old J Hastna vehicle).

) The front part of the 2nd part of the 2nd part of the 2nd part of the 2nd part of the 2nd part was caused by the occupational negligence. Ultimately, the Defendant got injured by the victim K (the 25th and the 4,037,207 years old and the 25th years old and the 303,631 won of the 3rd part of the 3rd part of the 3rd part of the 3rd part of the 3rd part of the 3rd part of the 3rd part of the 3rd part of the 3rd part of the 3rd part of the 3rd part of the 1st part, and escaped without taking measures when a traffic accident occurred, such as causing damage to the victims by immediately stopping the 303,631 won of the 3rd part of the 3rd part of the 3rd vehicle and providing relief to the victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the law No. 1 to 14, 16, and 18 to the evidence list submitted by the prosecutor

1. Aggravated punishment of specific crimes provided for in the corresponding Article of the Criminal Act.

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 안산지원 2014.10.07 2014고단1178

-대구지방법원 2013.05.09 2013고단919

-전주지방법원 정읍지원 2020.05.14 2020고단12

-창원지방법원 2013.01.16 2012고단3677

-창원지방법원 2014.01.28 2013고단2733