logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2013.05.09 2013고단919
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 2, 2007, the defendant was sentenced to a summary order of one million won for the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Daegu District Court on July 2, 2007, and on April 1, 2009, the same court issued a summary order of one million won or more for the same crime, respectively, and has been punished two times or more for the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act.

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of Cone Star Cargo Vehicles.

On December 27, 2012, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle on December 15:59, and proceeded one way ahead of the cafeteria cafeteria, which is located in the Round-ri, Gyeongbuk-gun, Gyeongbuk-gun, North Korea, to the north Triri-distance distance from the direction of the North Tri-gun.

In this case, a driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to take the front side and left side well and to accurately manipulate the steering and brakes so as to prevent accidents in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to drive the vehicle as it is and negligently driven on the right side of the Defendant’s cargo vehicle, which is owned by the victim D, which was parked on the right side of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the cargo vehicle of the Defendant, and the part of the back-hand side of the F Costaex, which is owned by the victim B, was moved into the front right side of the Defendant’s cargo vehicle, and due to the shock, the part of the back-hand part of the H-E-Wed vehicle owned by the victim G, which was parked on the front side of the back of the back of the passenger vehicle of the victim, was turned into the front part.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s occupational negligence caused repair costs to be 1,730,538 won, such as the aftermath, exchange of cargo in the victim D, and 6,273,219 won, such as the victim B’s exchange of 1,73,219 won, and the victim G’s repair cost to be 2,214,978 won, such as the exchange of 2,2178 won, such as the victim’s passenger car free exchange, but immediately stops the accident site.

arrow