logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2020.05.14 2020고단12
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 00:20 on January 7, 2020, the Defendant driven a FK5 vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.091% at approximately 275 meters from around the C cafeteria located in Seoul Special Self-Governing City, Jeollabuk-do to the E cafeteria located in D. In addition, the Defendant driven a FK5 vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.091%.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Non-accidents) by driving the said car at the time and time under Paragraph 1, the Defendant came to drive the said car at a speed of about 40 to 50km per hour according to the speed of speed from the string distance of the vehicle in front of H located in G in the city of Jeollabuk-do, Jeollabuk-do.

At that time, there are other vehicles parked on the right side of the road, so in such a case, those engaged in driving of a motor vehicle shall not drive the motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, and there was a duty of care to accurately manipulate the steering and brakes and prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the steering direction and brakes.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and erroneously operated the steering direction and operation system while driving under the influence of alcohol content 0.091%, and caused the Defendant to go through the part on the right-hand side of the victim J, which was parked in the passenger car driving direction of the Defendant, on the right-hand side of the Defendant’s vehicle driving zone, by taking the part on the right-hand side of the Defendant’s front-hand passenger vehicle, which was parked on the front-hand side of the Defendant’s vehicle, into the front-hand part of the Defendant’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by the above occupational negligence, destroyed the above Manman W car to be repaired in KRW 2,393,851, such as the exchange of the flart pans, and even though the said Manman car was damaged to be repaired in KRW 1,163,67, such as the pentum plate, the Defendant immediately stopped and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as providing the victims with personal information.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant;

arrow