logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.11.22 2018고단2534
사서명위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On March 29, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for a violation of the Military Service Act at the Seoul Eastern District Court on August 29, 201 and was sentenced to two years of suspended sentence on April 6, 2017, and the period of suspended sentence becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant, “2018 Highest 2534, 2534, while serving as a fine, driven B Otoba while driving it, controlled by police officers with a safety appearance, with a view to spreading the same fact, she would be aware of it.

1. On August 6, 2017, the Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act, counterfeited the signature of the company, and signed the above investigation (the signature of the vehicle operation statement) on the front side of the Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul National Police Agency’s name, which was drafted as above, and was demanded by the F, to provide “G”, which is the resident registration number of C, and verified that C did not have a driver’s license for the motor vehicle, made the F enter the name, personal information, and enforcement details of C, such as the resident registration number, in the vehicle operation statement, and issued it to F.

Accordingly, the defendant used C's resident registration number unlawfully, forged C's private signature, and exercised forged private signature.

2. On August 20, 2017, the Defendant: (a) committed traffic and H office in Gwangjin-gu Police Station in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter “Seoul Special Metropolitan City Police Station”) around August 20, 2017; (b) when the Defendant was investigated by driving without a license due to driving as stated in the foregoing paragraph (1) from the background leading up to the police station, C’s personal information, and was investigated as the victim; and (c) confirmed the content of the suspect interrogation protocol, signed the “C” on the person’s statement column, and issued it to I.

Accordingly, the defendant forged C's signature and used forged private signature.

Active duty servicemen of the 2018 Highest 2916.

arrow