logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.03.22 2016고단5932
상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 13, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 04:35, 2016, the victim B (the 66-year-old) was driving on the road front of the “food trees” located in the Gangseo-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul; (b) when the taxi stops on the 207 Gangnam-gu, Gangnam-gu, Seoul; (c) when the taxi stops on the front of the public playground of the 207 Gangnam-gu, Gangnam-gu, Seoul; (d) the Defendant opened the back seat of the taxi and opened the door to the outside; and (e) when the damaged person gets a leather, the Defendant provided the victim’s desire to “CM” with drinking the victim’s left chest at one time, while taking the victim’s drinking.

After going up on the back seat of the taxi, the Defendant, as a drinking back again, made the victim's face more than once, and tried to walk the victim's chest more than the floor, and divided the victim's blue with the victim's blue with his blue in a state beyond the blue.

In this regard, the defendant puts the victim's vertebral body organs with which the number of days of treatment can not be known.

2. On December 13, 2016, at around 07:32, 2016, the Defendant, at the Seoul Gangnam-gu Seoul Northern Police Station’s Criminal Police Station and the D Team’s office located in Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Seoul, and the police station’s circumstances where the Defendant belonged to the above police station, is investigated as the victim of the violent incident as referred to in paragraph (1) of the above paragraph (1) of the above Article, it is difficult to find that at the time, the Defendant was aware of the fact that the Defendant was born due to the arrears of the fine, by stating the F’s personal information in the statement column of the suspect interrogation protocol prepared by the above E, and forged F’s signature by affixing the Defendant’s name on his/her name, and by making the above E, without knowledge of the fact, bound the investigation record of the forged suspect interrogation protocol into the investigation record.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect with respect to F;

1. Application of the police statement protocol law to B

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts.

arrow