A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 2009, the Defendant forged an official document: (a) removed C’s photograph attached to the Defendant’s model C driver’s license issued by the Commissioner General of the Gyeonggi-do Police Agency; (b) removed the Defendant’s photograph at the same place; and (c) attached the Defendant’s photograph.

Accordingly, the defendant has forged one copy of driver's license for C in the name of the Commissioner General of the Do Police Agency for the purpose of uttering.

2. The defendant who commits fraud or uses forged official documents;

A. A. On November 11, 2009, at the substitute branch office of the Suwon Livestock Industry Cooperatives, the head of Sinsan-si, the head of Sinsan-si, the head of Sinsan-si, the head of Sinsan-si, filed an application for a loan under the name of Defendant C, and the head of Sinsan-si, the head of Sinsan-si, the head of Sinsan-si, the head of Sinsan-si, the head of Sinsan-si, would pay a loan amount of KRW 5 million after one year if he/she would give a loan with a loan amount of KRW 5 million, and the employee in charge of lending, who may know the forgery, presented that he/she completed the driver's license as above,

B. On October 20, 2010, at the above Livestock Cooperative Office, the term of the existing loan extended one year, and the completion of the existing loan was done as if it were C, and in the same manner, the C’s driver’s license, which is a forged public document, presented it as if it was issued genuinely.

(c)

On November 11, 2011, at the above livestock cooperative office, the above loan period was extended to 1 year again, and the above loan period was used as if it was C and the driver's license, which is a forged public document, was actually issued in the same manner, was presented as if it was actually issued.

However, at the time, the Defendant had operated the signboard manufacturer without the consent of the type C and operated the business under the name of the type C, and presented the business registration certificate, C’s tax payment certificate, and the above forged C’s driver’s license. As such, the Defendant was the victim bank.