Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months, by imprisonment for eight months, and by imprisonment for one of eight months.

However, for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants, along with the victim E, victim F, and victim G, distributed 4 copies of each card using 52 copies of each card, and conspired to commit fraud that manipulates the winning plaque by using a name card with a certain indication on the back of the card so that it can be identified in advance the other party’s plaque.

On August 13, 2016, from around 19:00 to around 00:00 the following day, the Defendants: (a) ambling with the victims at the I Office located in H; (b) ambling with the victims; and (c) as if Defendant A had engaged in normal gambling by using a wooden card prepared in advance, the Defendants deceiving the victims; (b) Ha was delivered from the victim E KRW 5 million, approximately KRW 3 million, and approximately one million from the victim F, respectively.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to obtain a total of nine million won from the victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Part concerning the defendants' statement G and E in the suspect interrogation protocol

1. Statement made to the prosecutor by the J;

1. K's certificate of fact;

1. Application of the police seizure protocol statutes;

1. Relevant Article 347(1) and Article 30 of the Criminal Act on the facts constituting the crime ( Defendants’ 1 and 2)

1. Article 37 (former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the Defendants)

1. Defendant B who led to the instant crime, including (a) the recovery of injury to the Defendants on the grounds of sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act, but not agreed with the victims; (b) Defendant A has no criminal record; (c) purchase of tools to be used for gambling; and (d) bringing about the commission of the commission of the instant crime: Defendant B has no criminal record of the same kind. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds that there was no criminal record of the same kind.