logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2017.08.31 2017고단613
사기
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of one year and six months, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of seven thousand won, and Defendant C shall be punished by five thousand won, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant B was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for perjury at the Busan District Court on February 15, 2016 and was sentenced to two years of suspended execution on February 23, 2016, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on February 23, 2016, and is currently under suspended execution.

[Criminal facts]

1. On November 9, 2016, from around 21:00 to 24:00, Defendants A, B, and C ambling in a manner that: (a) he received the first four copies of the card using 52 card with the victim’s home from the victim F; and (b) exchanged the card three times in order; and (c) finally, Defendant A, B, and C ambling in a manner that a person with a card with a low number of different non-satis and low number among the remaining cards would bring about a gold by winning the card.

However, in fact, the Defendants engaged in gambling by using gambling techniques, such as a prompt term “steve” and “steves” that mean the hand-on technology that arbitrarily alters the card, and a prompt term “steves” that combines the entire card to return to the prescribed order, and making the card go back, and making the Defendants stebling money in accordance with the pre-determined receipt, or abandoning games.

As a result, the Defendants conspired in collusion to do so, they deceiving the victim as if they actually engage in gambling, and acquired the amount equivalent to KRW 5.6 million from the victim as a gold.

2. On December 2017, Defendant A, using gambling techniques, such as a prompt name, referring to the name, sub-name, “G, etc.,” which means that the entire card should return to the victim F in the order determined by changing the entire card with the name, the police officer (one name, “G, etc.”), and through gambling, Defendant A spambling the victim F, and conspired Defendant A to divide the profits from gambling at a certain rate, and divide the profits therefrom at a certain rate.

Defendant

A, according to the above public offering, from January 10, 201 to 21:00 on January 17, 2017 to the victim’s residence, he/she received the first four pages using 52 cards together with the victim’s first four cards, and then received three times in order.

arrow