A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 01:10 on March 31, 201, the Defendant: (a) 01:10 minutes of assaulted the Victim E and the Victim F (the 56-year-old age) were working with another customer, and the Victim E and the Victim F (the 56-year-old age-old age-) expressed the Victim’s desire to “I am bling, ging, and ring, I am gling,” and the Victim expressed the Defendant “I am fling, I am fling, and I am at home” to “I am fling, I am fling, I am at the victim’s right side part of the victim’s drinking, and fling the victim’s fling with both hand.”

2. The Defendant of the obstruction of performance of official duties stated in paragraph (1), at the date and time, at the place, as described in paragraph (1), expressed that “I, after confirming the circumstances of the instant case and confirming the intention of punishment, I would like to request the Defendant to accompany the area. I would like to say that I would like to say, “I would be able to see YY Hah Hah Hah Hah Hah. I would be able to see Hah Hah Hah Hah Hah?? I would be able to perform daily treatment as soon as possible. I would be able to live in the bottom of the Hah Hah Hah Hah Hah, who was arrested as a flagrant offender, and she might walk at one time the head of the Hah Han Han Han Han Han Han Hast Hast Hast Hast Hast Hast Hast Hast Hast Hast k.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of a flagrant offender by a police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each interrogation protocol of F and E:

1. Each statement made to I and G;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Articles 136(1) and 260(1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act is the first crime (Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties).