logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안산지원 2020.08.13 2020고합59
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(운전자폭행등)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) stipulates that the Defendant was on board the instant car on the front side of G in light of the luxian Dogdong-dong 3, 2020 and two persons of the Defendant’s friendship C and his name in light of the night on March 3, 2020. However, according to the evidence examined by this court, it is apparent that the above facts are shown in light of the evidence examined by this court, and it cannot be said that it interfere with the Defendant

When the victim E (the 31-year-old male) who is a substitute driver, had the victim E (the 31-year-old male) drive the F Twinston car, and was on the back seat, the 23:38 day of the same day, and the victim was asked questions about the destination from the victim in front of G in the light-si G road, and the victim was able to be asked about the destination by the victim "Ippp Map Ma. Ip. Ip.", and the victim was injured by the hand, who was in turn at one time, and was spacked about two weeks of the victim's right right, and who was in need of treatment.

Accordingly, the defendant abused the driver of a vehicle in operation and suffered an injury.

2. On March 3, 2020, the Defendant engaged in obstruction of performance of official duties: (a) around 23:48, at the place indicated in the foregoing paragraph (1) and in the course of questioning the circumstances of the instant case, such as requesting the Defendant to present an identification card, the light-line I belonging to the H District of the Mine Police Station H District, which was dispatched after receiving the report of the above E- 112, “I” refers to “Woo Mak Makk Makkkk, Makkkkkk, Makkkk,” and assaulted by the Defendant, such as the luk hand, knish, f

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in regard to the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

Part of Defendant’s Court Statement

Application of the laws and regulations on police officers’ injury diagnosis report E to each police statement of I, E, and C, to the damaged parts of the police officer’s injury, image-fafag photographs, fag-fag-fag photographs

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and specific crimes as to the choice of punishment.

arrow