The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasoning for the appeal (one year and two months of imprisonment) of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. In light of all the sentencing conditions, including the Defendant’s age, sex behavior, motive, number of crimes, method of crimes, method of crimes, circumstances after crimes, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, considering the following factors: (a) the Defendant’s confession, the Defendant’s purchase, or the receipt, or the receipt, does not distribute phiphones; (b) the future will to stop crimes related to phiphones without committing any crime; and (c) there are many records of criminal punishment for the same kind of crime; and (d) the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crime due to the same crime; and (e) the number of times of the instant crime is not considerable; and (e) the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.