The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasoning for appeal (two years of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable in light of the following circumstances: (a) the confession of a crime and reflects on the determination; (b) the fact that the investigative agency actively cooperates in the investigation of narcotics-related criminal; (c) the fact that there was two times of punishment for the same crime; (d) the fact that the phone is a criminal committed during the period of repeated crime of the same kind; (c) the fact that the phone is sold and distributed in a way that the phone is sold and delivered free of charge through several times; (d) the fact that the phone is administered, possessed, and the nature of the crime is not less easily less; and (e) the fact that the volume of the phone handled is not much large; and (e) the sentencing conditions, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, motive, frequency of the crime, method of the crime, and circumstances

3. As such, the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the lower court (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 200Da484466, Apr. 1, 200).