The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasoning of the appeal (one year of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of all the sentencing conditions, including the defendant's age, sex behavior, motive, frequency of crime, method of crime, method of crime, circumstance after crime, etc., which are deemed necessary to be isolated from society for a specific period of time, and the fact that the defendant was led to a violation of the Narcotics Control Act (compact) in favor of the defendant, the number of crimes committed once and once, and the fact that the number of times of violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. is not many, despite the fact that the defendant had been punished several times for the same kind of crime, the defendant committed the crime in this case despite the fact that the defendant had the record of being punished several times for the same crime, the amount of phiphonephones purchased, and the fact that the defendant's toxicity and scopon administration seems to be considerable, the defendant's age, sex behavior, motive, frequency of crime, method of crime, circumstance after crime, etc., the court below's decision to dismiss the statement of evidence as stated in Article 364 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.