The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasoning of the appeal (one year of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of all the sentencing conditions, including the Defendant’s age, sex behavior, motive for the crime, frequency of the crime, method of the crime, circumstance after the crime, etc., the fact that the Defendant was sentenced to the highest punishment according to the sentencing guidelines in the lower court’s sentencing, and the fact that the Defendant was sentenced to the sentencing guidelines, in light of the following favorable circumstances: (a) the Defendant was led to confession and reflect by the Defendant; (b) there was no history of punishment for the same kind of crime; (c) cooperation in the investigation of narcotics by the investigative agency; and (d) the fact that the Defendant was showing a short sentence; and (c) the fact that the amount of the penphone handled by the Defendant was supplied is significant.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.