The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasoning for the appeal (one year and eight months of imprisonment) of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of all the sentencing conditions, such as the Defendant’s age, sex behavior, motive, frequency of the crime, frequency of the crime, method of the crime, circumstance after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, considering the following factors: (a) there was a history of punishment for the same kind of crime; (b) there was a repeated crime period due to the same kind of crime; (c) the distribution of phiphonephones by means of selling the phiphones; and (d) the fact that the volume of phiphones handled is not minor; and (b) there was no significant amount of phiphones handled; and (c) the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

3. As such, the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the lower court (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 200Da484466, Apr. 1, 200).