1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation.

The plaintiff is a local government under the Local Autonomy Act, and the Gyeonggi-do Art Group (hereinafter referred to as the "Arts Group") is an affiliated organization of the plaintiff who operates cultural and art business by employing more than 160 members and employees as of December 1, 1992 based on the Ordinance on the Establishment of the Gyeonggi-do Art Group.

The Intervenor A was admitted to the Arts Group on March 1, 2002; the Intervenor B on October 1, 1996; the Intervenor C on July 1, 2012; the Intervenor D on October 1, 1996; and the Intervenor D on October 1, 1996, respectively, and served as a full-time member of the Korean Ephte Eph.

A change in the requirements for re-commissioning art members has made a regular evaluation of the art members every two years in accordance with the "Ordinance on the Establishment of the Gyeonggi-do Art Group" and the "Regulations on the Service of the Gyeonggi-do Art Group" (hereinafter referred to as the "Service Regulations"), and has determined whether to re-commissions based on the results of the evaluation.

On April 30, 2012, the Plaintiff amended Articles 22(1), 24(1), 26, and 28 of the Service Regulations (hereinafter “former Service Regulations”) and subsequently re-commissioned the requirements for re-commissioned members as follows.

(2) In the case of a participant, a performance evaluation mark (20 points = 10 points in time of call) (2) work evaluation (2) work evaluation (2) work evaluation (10 points (10 points in time of call) (2) work evaluation (2) work evaluation (10 points (10 points in time of call 10 points). (3) If the standard point for re-commissioning (20 points = 10 points in time of call : 60 points) is below the standard point, the participant shall be demoted as a non-standing member who refuses to re-commissioning and re-commissioning after three months from the date of the change, and the Plaintiff, in accordance with the service regulations after the amendment, such as the instant lecture disposition, etc. against the participant, was conducted a regular rating in December 31, 2014, and thereafter, the base point for the actual commission points in case of the participant, A, and D shall be 60 points in time of call 20 points in time of call 20 points in time of call 30 points.