1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff established and operated C University (hereinafter referred to as “C”), and the Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as “ Intervenor”) was appointed as C tourism and assistant professor from March 1, 2013 to February 28, 2015 by setting the term of appointment from the Plaintiff on March 1, 2013 to February 28, 2015.

B. On September 13, 2014, the Plaintiff notified the Intervenor of the fact that the term of appointment expires on February 28, 2015 and the procedure for filing an application for deliberation when he/she wishes to be reappointed. On September 26, 2014, the Intervenor filed an application for deliberation on reappointment with the Plaintiff on September 26, 2014.

C. On November 24, 2014, the Plaintiff’s teachers’ personnel committee deliberated on the re-election of the Intervenor. Around that time, the Intervenor decided not to be reappointed, and notified this to the Intervenor.

On December 8, 2014, an intervenor filed an application for review with the Plaintiff. On December 16, 2014, the Plaintiff’s teachers’ personnel committee deliberated on the Intervenor’s reappointment on December 16, 2014. A decision was made to the effect that “The Intervenor, as indicated in the following table, failed to meet the standards of Article 7(4) of the Regulations on the Evaluation of the Achievements of Former Teachers Exclusively Responsible for Education (hereinafter “the Rules”) [the Article 7(4) [the Article 7(4) of the Act on the Evaluation of the Achievements’s Performance (hereinafter “the Rules”).

Accordingly, on December 30, 2014, the president notified the intervenors of their refusal to re-appoint the aforementioned contents.

(hereinafter “instant disposition rejecting re-employment”). Research (10 points) studies (10 points) quality education (10 points) with the overall point of (80 points or more) evaluation (10 points) in the field of evaluation of the term of contract of the class to which he/she belongs, and tourism and assistant professors B (20 points) from March 1, 2013 to February 92, 2015, 3.63 points 63 points or 79.15 points or more from February 28, 2015.

D. On January 8, 2015, an intervenor filed a petition with the Defendant seeking revocation of the disposition rejecting the reappointment of this case pursuant to Article 53-2(8) of the Private School Act.

On February 25, 2015, the Defendant’s area of compulsory evaluation (i) Articles 11 and 12 of the instant provision are any means.