1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff established and operated C University (hereinafter referred to as “C University”) and the Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as “ Intervenor”) determined the term of appointment on March 1, 2013 from March 1, 2013 to February 28, 2015, and is a teacher appointed as C major food nutrition and assistant professor.

B. On September 12, 2014, the Plaintiff notified the intervenors of the fact that the period of appointment expires on February 28, 2015, and the procedure for filing an application for deliberation on reappointment, and the Intervenor accordingly filed an application for deliberation on reappointment with the Plaintiff.

The Board of Review (80 or more points) studies (10 points) quality studies (10 points) 47.50 87.87 20.00 78.87 points 20.00 78.87 points 20.00

C. As a result of the deliberation on the re-election of the Intervenor from November 24, 2014 to December 25, 2014, the CF personnel committee decided not to re-appoint the Intervenor on the ground that the assessed points of the Intervenor do not meet the criteria of Article 7(4) of the Regulations on the Evaluation of his/her Full-time Teachers in Charge of demotion (hereinafter “Rules”) as indicated in the following table. The CF personnel committee decided not to re-appoint the Intervenor on the ground that the total amount of each area evaluated as a job is at least 80 (100 out of 100), and notified it to the Intervenor on December 1, 2014.

Although the Intervenor filed an objection against this, on December 16, 2014, the CF personnel committee decided that the Intervenor consents to re-consigning for the same reason as above, and accordingly, the Plaintiff finally issued a disposition of refusal to re-appointing the Intervenor (hereinafter “instant disposition of refusal”) against the Intervenor on December 30, 2014.

E. On January 27, 2015, the Intervenor filed a petition with the Defendant seeking revocation of the instant refusal disposition.

In relation to the education field on March 25, 2015, the Defendant: (a) even though the Intervenor submitted an application for sexual correction within the period for sexual correction, the Plaintiff’s reduction of one point to the Intervenor in the part of the second semester for sexual correction in the year 2013.