1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

The details and details of the decision on reexamination are local governments that establish and operate the A City Art Group (hereinafter referred to as the “instant Art Group”) for the promotion of local arts culture pursuant to the Ordinance on the Establishment and Operation of A City Art Group (hereinafter referred to as the “instant Ordinance”).

The Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter “ Intervenor”) was commissioned as a full-time member of the Arts Group of this case on July 20, 2001 and served as the leader of the boys and girls choir (hereinafter “instant choir”).

On July 3, 2015, the Plaintiff re-commissioned the Intervenor as a full-time member of the art group of this case every two years, and notified the Intervenor on July 3, 2015 that the Intervenor was dismissed from the position of a full-time member of the art group of this case as of July 20, 2015, based on Article 11 of the instant Ordinance and Article 13 of the Enforcement Rule of the Ordinance on the Establishment and Operation of the City Art Group of this case (hereinafter “Enforcement Rule of the instant Ordinance”).

(hereinafter "Dismissal of this case"). In the event that the evaluation of non-high regular evaluation (20 points) regular evaluation (5 points) regular evaluation (20 points) regular evaluation (5 points) is conducted twice the evaluation of the degree of performance of the two evaluations, the evaluation of the target achievement (20 points) evaluation (5 points), the evaluation of the evaluation of the art group (60 points) evaluation (10 points) document evaluation and interview evaluation (10 points) evaluation, and the average value after 10 points (10 points) evaluation of the work composition performance (10 points) evaluation and development plan (30 points) evaluation of the total number of 10 points for document examination, the re-commission of a standing member less than 70 points is dismissed on August 24, 2015, and the evaluation of the target achievement (5 points) evaluation (20 points) evaluation of the average value) evaluation committee (20 points) evaluation, the re-commission of the Gyeonggi Regional Labor Relations Commission was justified as a result of the evaluation of the work in this case.

“The Intervenor dismissed the Intervenor’s request for remedy.”

An intervenor shall be entitled to the proceeding.