logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2010. 05. 13. 선고 2010두3077 판결
명의신탁 관련 실질소유자 과세처분에 대해 명의신탁 사실이 없다는 주장의 당부[국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2009Nu19900 ( October 19, 2010)

Case Number of the previous trial

Seoul Administrative Court 2009Gudan75 (2009.06.09)

Title

The legitimacy of the assertion that no title trust was made with respect to taxation by the actual owner related to title trust

Summary

There is no evidence to acknowledge the title trust in view of the source of funds to acquire real estate, details of provisional registration of real estate, subject of actual attribution of transfer proceeds, etc.

The decision

The contents of the decision shall be the same as attached.

Text

The appeal shall be dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

The records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined. However, the grounds of appeal by the appellant are not included in the grounds prescribed in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, and the appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of

arrow