Seoul High Court 2008Nu30986 (Law No. 22, 2009)

The legitimacy of the assertion that the title trust shares did not receive a gift

In light of all the matters, the fact that the Plaintiff acquired the instant shares with the funds owned by the Plaintiff and thereafter held a title trust and returned to the Plaintiff’s name is sufficiently recognized. Thus, the disposition imposing the instant shares as a donation is erroneous.

The contents of the decision shall be the same as attached.

The appeal shall be dismissed.

Costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

The records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined. However, the grounds of appeal on the grounds of appeal are not included in the grounds stipulated in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, and the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition with