beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for four months.
However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, the defendant.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant A
A. C and D co-offenders, Defendant C, and C, and D agreed to provide credit guarantee through the store lease contract, business registration certificate, etc. for the financial convenience of workers over the middle and middle in the Gyeongbukbuk Credit Guarantee Foundation, using the most easy way for the Defendant to easily provide credit guarantee through the store lease contract, business registration certificate, etc., and to forge the store lease contract and use it for the purpose of personal debt repayment, etc. upon receiving credit guarantee from the above foundation. C forged documents necessary for the application for credit guarantee from the above foundation. D pretends that the credit guarantee foundation uses them temporarily for a field investigation for the examination of credit guarantee, and the Defendant conspired to proceed with the procedure for credit guarantee application, etc.
1) According to the foregoing public offering, the Defendant and C, and C, and D of private documents indicated in the indictment at the beginning of December 2014 as “ around January 18, 2015,” but they are clearly written in writing, so they are corrected.
In the form of a real estate lease contract purchased in advance without authority for the purpose of exercising 105 F Studio 105, which is the residence of C, the lessor stated that “A with respect to the store of H 1st floor, south-gu, Gyeong-gu, Nam-gu, Gyeong-gu, Gyeong-gu, G, the lessee, the deposit, and the lease term from August 20, 2014 to August 24, 2014, the lessor’s seal was affixed arbitrarily on the G side of the lessor’s column.
Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with C and D, forged one Chapter of the Real Estate Lease Contract in the name of G, a private document on rights and obligations.
2) According to the above public offering, the Defendant, C, and D submitted the forged real estate lease agreement as if it was duly concluded at the public service center of the port tax offices located on the south-gu coast of port on December 5, 2014, to an employee who could not know the forgery at the office of tax offices located on the south-gu coast of port at around December 5, 2014.
In this respect.