logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2017.07.12 2016고단1271
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Forging a private document;

A. On April 8, 2015, the Defendant stated in the column for the location of real estate in the real estate lease agreement, which was prepared in advance with a tamp-type tamp-2 of Ulsan-gu D apartment building B-2 of Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-gu, the Defendant placed the said G seal, which was rejected in advance by stating in the column for the location of the real estate in which the real estate lease agreement was located, “O million,500,000” in the deposit column, “O million,50,000” in the rent column, “APT 101-10101”, “F,” “G,” and “H” in the column for the lessor’s name.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged one copy of the real estate lease agreement in the name of G, a private document on rights and obligations for the purpose of exercising the right.

B. On October 16, 2015, the Defendant stated in the column for the location of real estate in the real estate lease agreement, which was prepared in advance with the mix-type 104, Nam-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-gu, Seoul-gu, the Defendant entered “one story-gu, Ulsan-gu, DAPT shopping mall”, “one thousand and ten thousand,000,000” in the deposit column, “one hundred and twenty thousand five hundred and fifty thousand,000” in the rent column, and “Y” in the lessor column as “I203, South-gu, J, K”, “K” and “L”.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged one copy of the real estate lease agreement in the name of K, which is a private document on rights and obligations for the purpose of uttering.

2. Exercising the relevant investigation document;

A. Around April 8, 2015, the Defendant, as described in the foregoing paragraph 1-A, exercised a false real estate lease agreement in the name of G with the knowledge of the forgery (C’s husband) as if the above forged real estate lease agreement was a document that was duly formed.

B. On October 16, 2015, the Defendant exercised the real estate lease contract under the name of K, which was forged as described in the above 1-B, as if it were a document that had been duly formed, with the knowledge of the forgery.

3. Fraud;

A. On April 8, 2015, the Defendant: (a) as if he/she completed a forged real estate lease agreement under G name, as described in the above 2-A, as if he/she were a genuine document.

arrow