(State)Revocation of decisions that meet the requirements for persons of distinguished service to the State;

A

Commissioner of Jeju Special Self-Governing Province

Jeju District Court Decision 2013Guhap387 Decided September 24, 2014

June 3, 2015

June 24, 2015

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

1. Purport of claim

The defendant's decision on February 27, 2013 that rendered to the plaintiff as a person of distinguished service to the State or a person eligible for veteran's compensation shall be revoked.

2. Purport of appeal

The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is the same as the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, the court’s findings of fact and judgment of the court of first instance do not change, even considering the additional allegations and evidence in the trial, pursuant to Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act (see

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim shall be quoted on the ground of its reasoning, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

The presiding judge, senior judge;

Judges Jeon Young-soo

Judges So-young