1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiffs citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations by the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and judgment by the court of first instance are justified even if the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court of first instance presented to this court was presented.

Therefore, the court's explanation of this case is as follows: (a) inserting the contents of the 4th 17th 17 and 18th 18 of the judgment of the first instance; (b) inserting the third 3rd 17 as the "survey Map"; (c) the 5th 11th 12 as the "U.S. Military Administration"; (d) the 6th 1st 1 as the "U.S. Military Land"; and (e) the 6th 6th 1 as the "U.S. Ruling"; and (e) the 6th 17th 17th "Correctional Land" as the grounds of the judgment of the first instance except correcting the "U.S. Ruling" as the "U.S. Ruling Land". Thus, it is cited as it

[Attachment]

E. The Plaintiff, who was the Plaintiff, died on May 27, 2015 while the instant lawsuit was pending in the first instance trial, and Plaintiff E, F, G, H, and I, the heir of the deceased D on November 1, 2017, who was the deceased’s heir, took over the network.

2. If so, all of the plaintiffs' primary claims and conjunctive claims are dismissed as they are without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.