1. All appeals by the defendant against the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

purport, purport, and.

The court's explanation of this case by the court of the first instance as to this case is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for adding the judgment of the first instance as set forth in the following paragraph (2) after the 7th judgment of the first instance. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Part 2 of the judgment of the first instance court, the "this Court" in Part 17, the "this Court" in Part 18, and the "this Court" in Part 3 shall be deemed to be the "Military Accounting Assistance of the Jeonju District Court".

On the 5th judgment of the first instance court, the "this judgment" in the 17th judgment shall be deemed to be "the first instance judgment".

Article 2(1) of the Addenda to the Regulations on Special Cases Concerning Expedition, etc. of Legal Proceedings, Article 3(1) of the former Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings (amended by Presidential Decree No. 26553, Sept. 25, 2015) shall be added to “Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings” in Article 18 of the first instance judgment.

"Nos. 21 through 24" shall be added to "No. 12" in the 6th sentence of the first instance court.

In addition, the defendant argues that the plaintiff C is a patentee of G's patent infringement against the defendant's patent, and the network E and the plaintiff B are involved in the infringement of G's patent, such as providing land and factory to G. Thus, the above plaintiffs' claims cannot be complied with. However, G et al. infringed the defendant's patent.

As seen earlier, there is no evidence to support that the agreement was reached on January 8, 2010 on the condition that the patent was not infringed, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion on this premise is rejected without examining any further.

In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and all appeals by the defendant against the plaintiffs are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.