1. All appeals by the defendant against the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

purport, purport, and.

The scope of the judgment of the court of first instance, which is within the scope of the judgment of the court, dismissed all the claims of the joint plaintiffs B, C, and D in the first instance court, and since the joint plaintiffs B, C, and D in the first instance court did not appeal, the parts concerning the joint plaintiffs B, C, and D in the judgment of the court of first instance were separated and finalized.

Therefore, the scope of this court's trial is limited to the plaintiffs' claims.

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is that the "collection team leader" of the first instance judgment No. 6, No. 15, and No. 17 of the first instance judgment is the same as the part concerning the plaintiffs in the first instance judgment, except for those used respectively by the "Management Team leader", and therefore, they are cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of

(A) The Plaintiff’s agent stated on April 9, 2018 that he/she filed an incidental appeal against the part of the Plaintiff’s loss on the legal brief, and stated it on the date of the first pleading of the court. However, it cannot be deemed that he/she filed an incidental appeal on the ground that he/she received a petition of appeal stating the indication of the judgment of the first instance and the purport of appeal against the judgment. Even if it can be deemed that the incidental appeal was filed, evidence to confirm whether the Plaintiff E was in charge of collecting the Defendant’s claim during the period of his/her affiliation cannot be submitted at all. Thus, the judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable as the conclusion, and thus, the Defendant’s appeal against the Plaintiffs is dismissed on the grounds that all of the appeals against