logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.10.28 2016나649
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation of this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following parts after the completion of each of the following parts. Thus, this is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(1) On the fourth page of the judgment of the court of first instance, the term “ditch” in the second page shall be read as “responding”.

(2) On the fourth part of the judgment of the first instance court, the “O land” in the fourth part of the judgment of the first instance shall be raised into “the upper N land”.

(3) On the fourth and sixth pages 11 of the judgment of the first instance court, “Defendant G” shall be raised to “Defendant”.

4. The phrase “Defendant F” in the 5th and 6th and 11 through 12 of the judgment of the first instance court shall be read as “Codefendant F of the first instance court”, respectively.

(5) On the 5th judgment of the court of first instance, the term "this court" in the 12th sentence shall be read as "court of the first instance".

(6) On the 5th judgment of the first instance, the term “the first instance court” shall be added to the front of “witness” in the 5th judgment.

(7) The following shall be added to Chapter 6, Part 5, and Part 7, "H" of the first instance judgment:

8. On the 6th, the 5th, 8th, and 17th, the Defendant’s “Defendants” shall be read as “Defendants and Codefendant F of the first instance trial.”

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow