logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원 2012. 10. 25. 선고 2012누576 판결
소득세법상 중소기업은 국내법인을 전제로 한 규정임[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Gwangju District Court 201Guhap4909 ( October 17, 2012)

Case Number of the previous trial

early 201luminous2533 ( October 11, 2011)

Title

Under the Income Tax Act, small and medium enterprises are provided on the premise of domestic corporations.

Summary

(1) Reduction of the tax rate due to the transfer of stocks of small and medium enterprises under the Income Tax Act is a provision for tax support for domestic small and medium enterprises in accordance with the legislative intent of the Framework Act on Small and Medium Enterprises, so foreign corporations cannot be deemed small and medium enterprises

Cases

2012Nu576 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing capital gains tax

Plaintiff and appellant

XX

Defendant, Appellant

Head of Seogju Tax Office

Judgment of the first instance court

Gwangju District Court Decision 2011Guhap4909 Decided May 17, 2012

Conclusion of Pleadings

September 27, 2012

Imposition of Judgment

October 25, 2012

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are incidental to the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. The defendant's imposition of capital gains tax of KRW 000 on July 1, 201 against the plaintiff on July 1, 201 shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The court's explanation on this case is as follows. The reasons for the court's explanation are as follows: "before the amendment by Act No. 9897 of Jun. 9, 2009" of No. 2, No. 7, No. 8, and No. 6, No. 7, and No. 7, No. 2, No. 9774 of the judgment of the court of first instance; "before the amendment by Presidential Decree No. 21765 of Oct. 1, 2009" of No. 3, No. 17, and No. 17, No. 7, and No. 17 of the judgment of the court of first instance as "Presidential Decree"; "No. 4, No. 13" of the judgment of the court of first instance as "No. 9897 of Dec. 31, 2009; and "No. 2, No. 2034 of Feb. 18, 2010"

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow