logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2016.12.21 2016고단25
뇌물수수
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of April and fine of KRW 2,000,000, and Defendant B shall be punished by fine of KRW 2,000,000, respectively.

The Defendants are the defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a public official of Grade VI in local administration who is in charge of the conclusion and management of various purchase contracts, construction contracts, service contracts, etc. ordered at F City while working as the F viewing accounts from July 15, 2013 to November 12, 2014, and Defendant B has been engaged in the business of manufacturing steel nets and steel pents with the trade name "H" from March 200 to March 200, and supplied products at F City.

1. Defendant A

A. On March 19, 2014, around 19:00 on the first day, the Defendant received a bribe in relation to the official duties of public officials by receiving the provision of meals and alcoholic beverages under the name of the market price, such as promoting convenience in future delivery, at the “J” restaurant located in I, and at the “H” restaurant located in I, the case where the “H” from the above B would allow F to continue the delivery of products at F.

B. On April 15, 2014, the Defendant received a bribe in relation to the public official’s duties by receiving an envelope containing KRW 300,000 in cash from the above B under the same name at the F viewing parking lot located in K, around 15:00.

C. At around 19:00 on July 1, 2014, the Defendant received a bribe in relation to the public official’s duties by receiving an envelope containing KRW 300,000 in cash from the above B under the same name.

At around 18:00 on October 14, 2014, the Defendant received a bribe in relation to the public official’s duties by being provided with meals under the same name of the market value of 45,000 won from the above B.

2. Defendant B offered a bribe as above to Defendant B, who is a public official, such as promoting convenience in future delivery, in each of the above dates and places, as the case where “H” allows F to continue the delivery of products at F.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each legal statement of witness P and Q in each court;

1. Partial statement of the witness B;

1. Each prosecutor's protocol of examination of the defendant B;

1. R.R.

arrow