logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2015.01.22 2014고단2170
범인도피등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for six months, Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment for two years and fine for 60,000,000 won, respectively.

Defendant

B above.

Reasons

Criminal facts

Defendant

A is a certified architect who operates the E-Building Office, and Defendant B is a public official who works for F viewing from August 14, 2001 to February 27, 201 as the green area permission team leader from construction division to February 27, 2013, and has worked as the head of the E-Building Administration Team from August 9, 201 to construction division.

1. In the process of filing an application for a building permit (a building area of 821.5 square meters) under the name of a utility tunnel on the land outside H (1,375 square meters) owned by G in a place where the domicile at the end of January 2012 is unknown, Defendant A received a proposal stating that “When the head of the group is unable to obtain a separate personnel from the head of the group of green belt permit teams, if the building permit to be included in the design cost would have been delivered to the head of the green belt permit team, it would be good if the head of the group would have received a separate personnel,” and then, he received a transfer of KRW 10 million from G to the deposit account in the name of the Defendant on April 2, 2012.

Accordingly, the Defendant received cash of KRW 10 million even with knowledge that he/she was on a bribe to a public official as above.

2. Defendant B

A. On April 2, 2012, the Defendant of acceptance of bribe around April 2, 2012: (a) was knowingly aware that G was paid as a honorarium in relation to the permission for construction of the utility tunnel, which was granted to G, while he was boarding a vehicle owned by the Defendant in the F viewing Service with the said Defendant, and was going to a restaurant located in the street in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

Accordingly, the defendant accepted a bribe of KRW 10 million in relation to his duties.

B. Around July 20, 2012, around July 2012, the Defendant received a solicitation from the said G to divide one parcel of land (2,510 square meters) located in I (2,510 square meters) into nine parcels of land from the said G, which is a land within the development-restricted zone. On July 20, 2012, the Defendant received KRW 20 million from G, within the vehicle owned by the Defendant, parked in the residential marina of the said G located in F City on the 20th day of the same month.

Accordingly, the defendant accepted a bribe of KRW 20 million in relation to his duties.

(i) the evidence;

arrow