logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.07.06 2017고단3445
관세법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Seized evidence 1 or 2 shall be confiscated.

349,637,200 won from the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Any person who intends to import sealed goods shall file a report thereon with the head of a customs office on the name, standard, quantity and price of the relevant goods, and other matters prescribed by Presidential Decree;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, along with C (one-person D, E, and current customs investigation), introduced gold at the time of entry into the Republic of Korea from Thailand and sold precious metal stores, such as Seoul, by way of customs clearance, intended to import gold without filing a declaration with the customs office, since there is little benefit in the case of paying taxes such as customs duties, etc. through regular customs clearance procedures.

According to the above public offering, the Defendant entered the Incheon International Airport in Thailand around April 1, 2017, around 06:35, and 100g gold bullion.

The sum of 700gs, market value of 34,619,200 won (amounting to 31,276,000 won of the cost of goods) was concealed in the bank and brought in as well as the sum of 6.9kgs, market value of 349,637,200 won (amounting to 317,678,000 won of the cost of goods) was sealed in the same way four times from April 1, 2017 to April 29, 2017, without filing a declaration with customs office.

2. The Defendant who attempted to import smuggling, in collusion with C as above, entered the Incheon International Airport in around May 6, 2017 around around 07:30 on May 6, 2017, as set out in the list of offenses Nos. 5 of the annexed crimes, and entered the Republic of Korea to the Incheon International Airport. The 1kg of gold bullion

Two and 100 foots

A total of 2.1km market value of KRW 104,365,800 (the cost of goods shall be equivalent to KRW 97,300,990), each of which was attempted to import smuggling without filing a declaration with the customs office, by exposing the personal effects carried by the customs office.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written accusation, each investigation report, and expert report;

1. Application of statutes on records of seizure and lists of seizure;

1. Article 269(2)1 and Article 241(1) of the Customs Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act (in the case of a crime under Article 271(2) of the Customs Act, adding Article 271(2) of the Customs Act to the crime under Article 269(2)1 and Article 241(1) of the same Act, and Article 1.

arrow