1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant is a juristic person established on March 2, 2002 for the purpose of efficiently constructing, managing, and operating airports in accordance with the Korea Airports Corporation Act to facilitate air transportation and to carry out the business of fostering and supporting the aviation industry. The plaintiff is a person who served as an overseas business expert in the B team and C team of the defendant.

B. On December 3, 2012, the Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded a labor contract between the Plaintiff and the Defendant to employ the Plaintiff as a fixed-term worker (overseas business experts) and two years (from December 3, 2012 to December 2, 2014) (hereinafter “instant labor contract, including renewed labor contract”).

(2) On December 3, 2014, the Defendant concluded a labor contract with the Plaintiff for one year (from December 3, 2014 to December 2, 2015).

3) On December 3, 2015, the Defendant concluded a labor contract with the Plaintiff for one year (from December 3, 2015 to December 2, 2016) with the term of the contract. 4) On January 1, 2017, the Defendant concluded a labor contract with the Plaintiff for one year (from December 3, 2016 to December 2, 2017).

C. On November 27, 2017, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff that “the term of employment contract expires as of December 2, 2017, and no longer renewed the contract.”

(hereinafter “Notification of the Termination of the instant employment contract”). 【No dispute exists concerning the termination of the instant employment contract (based on recognition), entry of evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and the purport of the entire pleadings.

2. The Plaintiff’s allegation that the termination of the instant employment contract is unfair as it refuses to renew the employment contract without reasonable grounds and notifies the termination of the contract, even if the Plaintiff’s claim is recognized as the right to renew the employment contract.

In addition, the notice of the expiration of the instant employment contract violates Article 24 of the Labor Standards Act which provides for the requirements for managerial dismissal, and violates Article 26 of the Labor Standards Act by failing to give notice of dismissal, and the Labor Standards Act provides written notice of dismissal.