logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2019.03.21 2017가합208694
해고무효확인
Text

1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Relevant Defendant is a social welfare foundation established for the purpose of contributing to the promotion of the welfare of persons with disabilities by accepting intellectual disabilities under the Welfare of Persons with Disabilities Act, which operates social welfare facilities under the jurisdiction of Yongcheon City, including C facilities and D facilities. The Plaintiff entered into an employment contract with the Defendant and worked at C facilities from July 1, 2015 to March 31, 2017.

B. Labor contract 1) The Plaintiff between the Plaintiff and the Defendant on July 1, 2015, with the term of the contract between the Defendant and the Defendant from July 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 (hereinafter “first employment contract”).

(2) On December 31, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into the first employment contract with the Defendant to renew the contract, and the term of the contract was from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016.

(3) On December 31, 2016, the Plaintiff concluded a secondary employment contract with the Defendant, and the term of the contract was fixed from January 1, 2017 to March 31, 2017 (hereinafter “third employment contract”) (hereinafter “third employment contract”), and the term “third employment contract” refers to “third employment contract.”

C. C. On February 23, 2017, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff on March 31, 2017 that the instant employment contract was terminated.

2) On February 27, 2017, the Plaintiff requested the Defendant to extend the employment contract by up to one year until March 31, 2018. If the contract is extended, the Plaintiff does not demand a conversion of a contract for a indefinite term even if the contract is extended, and if the situation of the E University, etc. is improved, the Plaintiff may voluntarily withdraw even before the contract expires. However, the Defendant respondeded that the instant employment contract expires on March 31, 2017, in accordance with relevant laws and procedures on March 3, 2017.

The plaintiff's refusal to renew the defendant.

arrow