The defendant shall be innocent.

On June 29, 2017, at the management office of the apartment apartment B in Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu around 11:30 on June 29, 2017, the defendant is about to have two copies of the DNA examination on the same apartment C ( South, 56 years old), the victim of the apartment, who is a resident of the apartment.

“In doing so by cutting off the DNA newspaper cited by the victim, the victim and the victim were fluencing with the victim, and the victim got the DNA newspaper cited by the victim and let the victim go beyond the latter, thereby causing bodily injury, such as the number of days of treatment, which cannot be known to the victim.

Judgment

1. The gist of the defendant's assertion did not have inflicted an injury on the victim C (hereinafter only referred to as the "victim") at the time of the instant case. However, the victim suffered an injury upon the victim's own wall because the victim was dissatisfied with the defendant's examination while the victim was dissatisfied with the head of the wall.

2. Determination

A. We examine the credibility of the victim's statement and the value of evidence, first of all, whether the victim's investigative agency and the court's statement that can be seen as the major evidence of this case can be believed.

The injured party in the police station "the accused was boomed by the injured party.

D In order to carry out a flapsy, the Defendant was prosecuted to the effect that “the Defendant flapsed against the victim’s head and faced with the wall with the victim’s head with the wall by flapsing the flapsing the flapsing of the victim” based on the above statement. Based on the above statement, the Defendant was indicted to the effect that “the Defendant flapsed the victim’s flab and pushed off the victim’s head with the wall facing the victim’s head.”

However, in this court, the victim suffered bodily injury by having the defendant go over with breath by dump.

However, the reason why the defendant can balthize is not memoryd at all, and the background leading to the management office, which is the site of this case, has not been memoryd properly.

On the other hand, the apartment management causes of witnessing the field at the time.