Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and the victim B(n, 47 years old) are married couples.

1. On January 8, 2017, at around 23:00, the Defendant: (a) thought that the victim was friendly in the dwelling space located in Gangseo-gun, Gangwon-gun, and (b) thought that the victim was her desire to do so; (c) caused the victim’s right shoulder to the wall by pushing the victim in the body of the Defendant, thereby causing approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim; and (d) inflicted injury on the victim, such as dynas, boness, tensions, etc. of the bones in need of treatment for about two weeks.

2. The Defendant damaged property by cutting off the cellular phone owned by the victim at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) and destroying the said cell phone so that the repair cost would be KRW 91,000 by cutting off the cell phone owned by the victim on the floor.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness B;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Written estimate for repair of a mobile phone and application of receipt statutes;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury), Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Defendant and the defense counsel’s assertion on the assertion of the Defendant and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act alleged to the effect that the Defendant did not inflict any injury on the victim. However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court, namely, the Defendant also acknowledged the fact that the Defendant was faced with the victim as the victim was pushed off during the punishment of the victim. ② The victim was punished by the Defendant from the investigative agency to the court, relatively consistently, by the Defendant from the court to the court, and the Defendant was faced with the wall. Unlike the expectation that the Defendant would be punished by fine thereafter, the victim continued to look at the Ampha hospital.

in light of the statement, etc.