A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The defendant applied for the re-issuance of his pro-friendly B resident registration certificate, and received a certificate of application for the issuance of his resident registration certificate, and used it to open his mobile phone in B’s name to sell it to the poster;

On January 16, 2014, the Defendant entered “B”, “C” and “B” in the name column of the application form for the re-issuance of resident registration certificates at the film-dong community service center located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the film-dong, and signed the name column of the application form for re-issuance of resident registration certificates to “B” in the signature column, and received a written application form for issuance of resident registration certificates from the employees in charge of non-name as if they were duly formed documents.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the defendant forged the application for re-issuance of the resident registration certificate in B, a private document related to rights and duties, and exercised the forged application for re-issuance.

2. On the same day as described in paragraph 1, the Defendant presented a written confirmation of the application for issuance of a resident registration certificate issued under paragraph 1 to an employee under his name in Suwon-si mobile phone sales store F, and signed the name column of Chapter 2 of the application form for issuance of a mobile phone, stating “B” in the name column of Chapter 2 of the application form for issuance of a mobile phone, “C” in the resident registration number column, and “B” in the address column as “B” in the applicant column, and submitted two copies of the application form for issuance of a mobile phone to the SK Telecom.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, two copies of the application for joining the mobile phone in B, which is a private document related to rights and duties, were forged, and two copies of the application for joining the forged mobile phone were held.

3. The Defendant, at the same time and place as described in paragraph 2, had the victim’s name influence, who is an employee of the mobile phone sales store, by deceiving the victim, and received two mobile phones from the victim, whose market price is unknown.

In this respect.