A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, on the Internet’s website, expressed an advertisement of KRW 100,000,00 on the main page of the mobile phone instead of the mobile phone, and expressed a written confirmation of application for the issuance of a resident registration, stating personal information of other persons, from the person in an influence to his/her name, with the intention to open the mobile phone using it.

1. On October 3, 2015, the Defendant forged official document: (a) attached the Defendant’s photograph to the “C” page located in Geumcheon-gu Seoul, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul; (b) the Defendant’s photographed the Defendant’s application form for the issuance of resident registration indicating the DNA personal information taken from his/her name in the photo page.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a written application for issuance of D resident registration certificates under the name of the head of Seodaemun-gu Dong, Seodaemun-gu.

2. At the time of the day specified in paragraph (1), the Defendant: (a) made a mobile phone entry application in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government “C”; (b) made a cell phone entry application in the name of the subscriber “D”; (c) “E”; (d) “E”; (d) in the customer address column; and (e) made a statement in the bank name column, “G” and “D” on the bank name column; and (d) affixed a seal on the applicant column.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a written application for joining a mobile phone in the name of D, which is a private document related to rights and obligations.

3. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph 2, exercised a forged official document and the instant investigation document with H as stated in paragraphs 1 and 2, who is an employee of the said C, who is aware of the forgery, respectively, and exercised a written confirmation of the application for issuance of a forged resident registration certificate and a mobile phone subscription application as if the document was duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A copy of the certificate to apply for issuance;

1. A copy of the application for joining the ELS cell phone;

1. Application of the C Staff Statements to the statutes

1. The relevant Article of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;