All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. Determination on the grounds for appeal by Defendant C

A. The summary of the grounds for appeal by the defendant (1) The fact that the defendant's multiple businesses had been involved in the misunderstanding of facts is true, or there is no reason for multiple employees to arrange the conduct of sexual traffic.

(2) The sentence imposed by the lower court on the Defendant (limited to four years and six months of imprisonment, and 80 hours of order to complete a program) is too unreasonable.

B. (1) According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court regarding the assertion of mistake of facts, the lower court may recognize the fact that K, K, and L, who were employed by the Defendant, received KRW 150,00 from the persons who ordered the tea in the tea room and engaged in sexual traffic; K, and L deposit KRW 90,000 out of KRW 1.50,000 received in return for sexual traffic; the Defendant and AA entered the money deposited in the multiple accounts separately from the income acquired in return for sexual traffic in the next delivery; and as such, the Defendant, while performing the work of preparing multiple sales books and distributing leaflets papers, knowing that multiple employees are engaging in sexual traffic.

According to the above facts of recognition, it can be sufficiently recognized that the defendant has arranged the act of buying sex of a juvenile by arranging or promoting convenience between the parties who intend to engage in sexual traffic while operating multiples with the trade name of "J" (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2004Do8808, Feb. 17, 2005). Thus, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

(2) There are no circumstances to consider the Defendant’s assertion of unreasonable sentencing, including the fact that he/she generally accepted the facts of crime and divided his/her mistake, and led to the confession of perjury.

However, the crime of this case is not a good crime because the defendant arranged sexual traffic while employing juveniles as employees and operating a multilateral bank, obtained the loan by using forged employment certificate, etc., and made a false testimony for D who is an accomplice.