logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.02.03 2015고단1778
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months and by a fine not exceeding 5,00,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is an operator of the “D D D”) in Yong-gun Nam-gun, and E is a person who operates the above multi-party with the Defendant’s wife and manages employees, and F is an employee of the above multi-party.

On July 8, 2014, the Defendant, in collusion with E on July 22:05, 201, received 30,000 won per hour from F under the pretext of arranging the act of arranging sexual intercourse by inducing F to go to Gel in the middle of the above multilateral area and to go to H and sexual intercourse, etc. in the middle of the apartment.

Accordingly, the defendant conspireds with E to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of a suspect of the police officer regarding I;

1. Second-time protocol concerning H concerning the examination of suspect of the police;

1. Each police statement to J or K;

1. F's written confirmation (F) and written explanation;

1. One copy of a written delivery;

1. On-site photographs, the defendant and his/her defense counsel did not engage in the business of arranging sexual traffic

The argument is asserted.

According to the evidence adopted and investigated by this court, the J and K reported each other's business of arranging sexual traffic to each of their respective employees to the investigation agency, and stated the same content as to the business method and the method of delivery, and one of the employees I did not engage in sexual traffic like other employees.

After making a statement, the position of J and K changed and engaged in sexual traffic as stated in the manner stated by J and K, and entered in the same manner as the daily guidance.

The stated facts, the statement of delivery does not properly explain the specific amount when based on the statement of the defendant or employees, including the defendant or F, including the defendant (which is expressed on the upper part of the "entry" is not the price for sexual traffic, but the money paid by the employees was written.

One sales details and calculation are not in conformity with the Commercial Sex Acts, which did not engage in commercial sex acts.

part of the stated employees shall be.

arrow